Dois Tipos de Experimentação: Onde bypasses institucionais se encaixam?

Authors

  • Kevin E. Davis Beller Family Professor of Business Law, New York University School of Law

Keywords:

bypasses, desenhos institucionais, governança experimental

Abstract

O conceito de experimentação está em voga em discussões sobre desenho institucional. Entretanto, este conceito apresenta uma importante ambiguidade, enfatizada no trabalho de Mariana Prado e Michael Trebilcock sobre bypasses institucionais. Os autores definem bypass como uma espécie de reforma institucional baseada na criação de uma instituição à parte que opera em paralelo e executa as mesmas funções da instituição original (Prado e Trebilcock 2019, 6–7). Assim, os autores conceituam bypasses como modos de criar possibilidades para experimentação. Ao mesmo tempo, Prado e Trebilcock diferenciam bypasses institucionais de estudos randomizados controlados ou randomização, um dos tipos mais conhecidos de experimentação (2019, 10–11). Ao fazer tal distinção eles destacam o fato de que a literatura sobre experimentação em desenho institucional cobre, no mínimo, duas diferentes concepções de experimentação. Parte dos trabalhos utiliza ‘experimentação’ como randomização; outra parte utiliza experimentação como processos mais abertos, associados à governança experimental. Este breve ensaio aborda a distinção entre esses dois tipos de experimentação, argumentando que bypasses institucionais normalmente se encaixam mais no segundo tipo, e enfatizando que os dois tipos de experimentação possuem diferentes vantagens e desvantagens como meios de aprendizado e de reforma.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kevin E. Davis, Beller Family Professor of Business Law, New York University School of Law

Kevin Davis teaches courses on contracts, commercial law, regulation of foreign corrupt practices, and law and development. His current research is focused on contract law, anti-corruption law, and the general relationship between law and economic development. Davis received his BA in economics from McGill University in 1990. After graduating with an LLB from the University of Toronto in 1993, he served as law clerk to Justice John Sopinka of the Supreme Court of Canada and later as an associate in the Toronto office of Torys, a Canadian law firm. After receiving an LLM from Columbia University in 1996, he was appointed an assistant professor at the University of Toronto and in 2001 was promoted to associate professor.

References

Davis, Kevin E. 2010. “Legal Universalism: Persistent Objections.” University of Toronto Law Journal 60 (2): 537–53.

———. 2019a. Between Impunity and Imperialism: The Regulation of Transnational Bribery. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

———. 2019b. “The Limits of Evidence-Based Regulation: The Case of Anti-Bribery Law.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3490807. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3490807.

Davis, Kevin E., e Mariana Prado. 2014. “Law, Regulation and Development.” In International Development: Ideas, Experience, and Prospects, edited by Bruce Currie-Alder, S. M. Ravi Kanbur, David Malone, and Rohinton Medhora, 477–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

De Búrca, Gráinne. 2017. “Human Rights Experimentalism.” American Journal of International Law 111 (2): 277–316.

De Búrca, Gráinne, Robert O. Keohane, e Charles Sabel. 2014. “Global Experimentalist Governance.” British Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 477–86.

Department of Justice. 2015. “Nine FIFA Officials and Five Corporate Executives Indicted.” May 27, 2015. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/nine-fifa-officials-and-five-corporate-executives-indicted-racketeering-conspiracy-and.

Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of New York. 2018. “Former FIFA Executive, President of CONMEBOL and Paraguayan Soccer Official Sentenced to Nine Years in Prison for Racketeering and Corruption Offenses.” August 29, 2018. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/former-fifa-executive-president-conmebol-and-paraguayan-soccer-official-sentenced-nine.

Prado, Mariana Mota, e Michael J. Trebilcock. 2019. Institutional Bypasses: A Strategy to Promote Reforms for Development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Sabel, Charles F., e Sabel Zeitlin. 2012. “Experimentalist Governance.” In Oxford Handbook of Governance, edited by David Levi-Faur. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

The Committee for the Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. 2019. “Understanding Development and Poverty Alleviation.” Scientific Background on the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel.

The Nobel Prize. 2019. “The Prize in Economic Sciences 2019.” NobelPrize.Org. Nobel Media AB 2020. December 11, 2019. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2019/summary/.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Davis, K. E. (2020). Dois Tipos de Experimentação: Onde bypasses institucionais se encaixam?. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL STUDIES, 6(3), 1453–1459. Retrieved from https://estudosinstitucionais.emnuvens.com.br/REI/article/view/543

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2020)

Section

Book Review

License

The authors hold their copyright and concede to the JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL STUDIES the right to the first publication, in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution license.

Authors are strongly encouraged to publish their manuscripts in other medias, such  as institutional repositories and personal pages. The Journal only requires the credits of the first publication.